IPK 2022 | Feedback Overview

An adjudicator's score is determined by a customisable mix of their base score and their feedback ratings. The current mix is specified below as the 'Score Components.' Feedback ratings are determined by averaging the results of all individual pieces of feedback across all rounds. Read more.

8-10

6-8

4-6

Score Distributions (range is 0.0–10.0)

20%

Base

80%

Feedback

GF Score Ratio

9 chairs

11 panellists

4 trainees

Auto-Allocate Distributions (6.0+ to vote)


Adith	UNPAR	10.0
Ayu Rahmah Hidayah	UNRI	5.4
Azalia Anindy	UNPAD	10.0
Chantique	Telkom	7.6
Chicha Dinda	Trisakti	5.2
Citra	UNY	8.4
Dewi Nurngaini	UII	5.3
Diah Ajeng Nova Ananda	UINSKY	6.6
Estherina Mulyani	ULM	7.3
Indra	Telkom	7.3
Jenerio Michal Mokalu	UNManado	6.4
Josh	UI	8.0
Kael	IPB	8.8
Katamie	UNPAD	8.4
M Al Ansharie Y	UNDIP	8.0
Matthew	UGM	8.4
Nabil	IPB	8.2
Pya Nuraeni	IPB	7.1
Rachmi Nafissa Ramadhan	ULM	6.8
Ramadhe	UB	7.8
Rendy Utomo	President	10.0
Rizal Galih Pradana	UNS	7.2
Stefhanie Budianto	UBAYA	5.6
Vieri Adi	ULM	8.2

Score Distributions (range is 0.0–10.0)

20%

80%

GF Score Ratio

Auto-Allocate Distributions (6.0+ to vote)

Adith

Ayu Rahmah Hidayah

Azalia Anindy

Chantique

Chicha Dinda

Citra

Dewi Nurngaini

Diah Ajeng Nova Ananda

Estherina Mulyani

Indra

Jenerio Michal Mokalu

Josh

Kael

Katamie

M Al Ansharie Y

Matthew

Nabil

Pya Nuraeni

Rachmi Nafissa Ramadhan

Ramadhe

Rendy Utomo

Rizal Galih Pradana

Stefhanie Budianto

Vieri Adi